|
Author
|
Topic: Wanted: Digital Camera vs. 35mm Camera
|
Active Member
Member # 22
|
posted May 31, 2002 10:01 AM
 
My sisters and I are planning on buying my Father a new Camera for Father's Day and his Birthday.He currently uses an older 35mm Minolta, which he seems to like. Does anyone have any suggestions on a 35mm or would it be better to step into a nice digital camera. Do the Digital line camera's even compare to the 35mm features? Print quality? I used the HP Photosmart 1000 printer on my Canon Powershot s300 2.2 megapixel camera and the quality was still not close to that of a good 35mm. Does anyone have any hands on expierence or helpful insight on this? "Live with Passion"
Posts: 129 (0.03 per day) | From: Royal Oak | Registered: Mar 2001 (3438 days) | IP: Logged!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Administrator
Member # 1
|
posted May 31, 2002 12:28 PM
 
If I went analog, I would definitely stick with Nikon. Perhaps the Nikon N66? LOL. No such thing. But yes, definitely Nikon.However, you'd be surprised to find out how well digital cameras actually work in manual mode. You can adjust f-stop, aperature, etc, to take custom pics. All a matter of preference. If your dad likes developing his pics, or likes the fun, challenge (or grief) of manual SLR's, then stick with analog. However, if your dad is not going to print pics larger than 11X17 (gosh, who on earth would?), and isn't fond about stuffing pics into a photo album that nobody will ever look at, then digital is the way to go. You can pick and choose WHICH photos to keep, WHICH photos to print, and you can even email a pic to aunt betty in Memphis. Plus you can even capture movies! Forgot about that benefit. "He who seeks the truth must doubt everything." Aristotle "Solitude is the beginning of all freedom." W. Douglas "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof." Carl Sagan
Posts: 5923 (1.71 per day) | From: Sterling Heights, MI | Registered: Feb 2001 (3452 days) | IP: Logged!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|